In the first paragraph, while you effectively discuss the impact of ICBMs on public fear and government propaganda, you could enhance your argument by providing more specific examples of how this fear translated into policy decisions or military actions. For instance, you could mention the arms buildup or specific military exercises that were a direct response to this fear. Additionally, consider clarifying the connection between public sentiment and government actions to strengthen your argument.
In the second paragraph, you provide a good overview of the Cuban Missile Crisis and its implications for East-West tensions. However, you should focus more on the consequences of the crisis rather than just the events leading up to it. Discuss how the crisis changed public perception and policy in both the US and the USSR. Also, ensure that you maintain a clear and coherent structure throughout your argument, as some sentences are quite long and could be broken down for clarity.
The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the arms race and its contribution to tensions between East and West. The use of specific events, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis and the introduction of ICBMs, provides a solid foundation for your argument. Additionally, the inclusion of public sentiment and propaganda adds depth to your analysis.
To achieve a higher mark, you should provide more detailed examples and analysis of how the arms race directly influenced government policies and military actions. Additionally, improving the clarity and structure of your writing will help convey your arguments more effectively. Consider breaking down complex sentences and ensuring that each point is clearly linked to the overall argument.
Overall, the essay presents a relevant and coherent analysis of how the arms race contributed to tensions between East and West. While there are strong points and a good understanding of the topic, the essay would benefit from more detailed examples and a clearer structure to enhance the overall argument. Focus on linking public sentiment to government actions and providing a more in-depth analysis of the consequences of key events.