In the first paragraph, while you introduce the categorization of the poor effectively, you could enhance your analysis by explaining how this categorization specifically influenced government policies and public attitudes. For example, you might discuss how the sympathetic view of the helpless and deserving poor led to specific legislative changes or social programs.
The second paragraph provides a good overview of poor relief measures, but it lacks specific examples of the laws or schemes implemented during this period. To improve, you could mention specific acts, such as the Act for Relief of the Poor in 1576, and explain how these laws directly impacted the lives of the poor, thereby strengthening your argument.
In the third paragraph, you correctly identify the harsh treatment of the undeserving poor, but the analysis could be more detailed. Instead of just stating the laws, consider discussing the societal attitudes that led to these harsh measures and how they reflect the fears of the time regarding poverty and crime. This would provide a deeper understanding of the consequences of these laws.
The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the different categories of the poor and how this categorization influenced public perception and government action. The structure is logical, with a clear progression of ideas from categorization to poor relief and then to the treatment of the undeserving poor.
To achieve a higher mark, the essay should include more specific examples of legislation and policies related to poor relief. Additionally, deeper analysis of the implications of these laws and how they reflect societal attitudes towards poverty would enhance the overall argument. Incorporating more historical context and details would strengthen your response.
The essay provides a solid overview of the changes in the treatment of the poor during the Elizabethan period, with a clear structure and relevant points. However, it lacks depth in analysis and specific examples that would elevate it to a higher mark. Focusing on the implications of government actions and providing detailed examples of poor relief measures would improve the quality of the response.