The first paragraph begins to analyze the natural world in 'A Day in Autumn', but it lacks depth in exploring the methods used by the poet. To improve, consider discussing more specific techniques, such as imagery or metaphor, and how they contribute to the overall meaning. For example, you could analyze how the phrase 'in the long cold' evokes a sense of prolonged suffering and how it contrasts with the beauty of nature.
The second paragraph introduces a comparison between the two poems, but it does not fully develop the ideas presented. It would benefit from clearer connections between the methods used in both poems. For instance, you could elaborate on how the domestic imagery in 'the washing never gets done' reflects the burdens of daily life and compare it to the imagery in 'A Day in Autumn'.
The third paragraph is incomplete and does not provide any analysis. To improve, ensure that each paragraph has a clear focus and concludes with a strong statement that ties back to the question. Consider discussing how both poets ultimately convey the relationship between daily life and the natural world.
The essay identifies key themes in both poems, such as the contrast between daily life and the natural world. It attempts to engage with the question by comparing the two works, which is a positive aspect of the response.
To achieve a higher mark, the essay should provide a more detailed analysis of the poets' methods, including specific language, form, and structure. Additionally, ensuring that each paragraph is fully developed and clearly linked to the question will strengthen the overall argument.
The essay demonstrates an understanding of the themes in both poems, but it lacks depth in analysis and comparison of the poets' methods. To improve, focus on providing specific examples and a more thorough exploration of how language and imagery create meaning in both works. A clearer structure with complete thoughts in each paragraph will enhance the overall quality of the response.