In the first paragraph, while you present a clear argument, it would benefit from more textual evidence to support your claim about the girl's visibility to Rosie. Consider including specific quotes that illustrate how Rosie perceives the girl. Additionally, clarify the implication of Cara's behavior regarding the girl's existence.
The second paragraph provides a good analysis of the girl's secretive nature, but the explanation of the simile could be more detailed. Instead of just stating that it makes her seem inhuman, explore how this affects the reader's perception of the girl. Also, ensure that your points are clearly linked to the question about the girl's disappearance.
In the third paragraph, you effectively discuss the ghost-like qualities of the child. However, the connection between the high fences and the child's supernatural abilities could be strengthened. Instead of just stating that she must have used supernatural power, consider discussing how this contributes to the overall mystery of her character. Also, be careful with spelling errors like 'ace' instead of 'face'.
The fourth paragraph introduces the idea of the child's poverty, which is a valid point. However, you should elaborate on how this aspect of her character influences Rosie's perception of her. Additionally, ensure that your analysis remains focused on the question of whether the child is real or part of Rosie's imagination.
In the final paragraph, you present an interesting theory about the child's age and appearance. However, this point could be more concise. Instead of suggesting multiple possibilities, choose one or two key ideas to explore in depth. This will help maintain clarity in your argument.
The essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the text and presents a range of interpretations regarding the child's character. The use of textual references, such as similes and adjectives, shows an attempt to engage with the writer's methods, which aligns well with the mark scheme.
To achieve a higher mark, the essay should include more direct textual evidence to support claims, ensure that all points are clearly linked to the question, and avoid ambiguity in interpretations. Additionally, improving the clarity and coherence of arguments will enhance the overall quality of the response.
The essay presents a thoughtful evaluation of the text, exploring various interpretations of the stranger child. However, it lacks depth in textual analysis and could benefit from clearer connections to the question. Strengthening the use of textual evidence and refining the argumentation will improve the overall effectiveness of the response.