In source A, the writer feels that child prisoners are loved and cared for as if the prison is its family. The writer effectively portrays the manager as a mother-like figure to child prisoners, “he encourages the perfect balance between nurture and discipline”. The noun “perfect” is a use of hyperbole, as no human is perfect. This presents the manager as almost a God-like figure who is the perfect model for how to take care a child. This implies the child prisoners are well-cared for, and therefore their psychological and mental health is healthy. In contrast, in Source A, the writer feels that the child prisoners are neglected and uncared for. We learn that the child has a “gaunt face”. The adjective “gaunt” implies how the child prisoner has been prematurely aged by the prison’s neglect, emphasising the psychological effect the neglect of the prison has had on child prisoners. The child is also in a “dimly-lit cell”. As light is expensive, the lack of light as suggested bu the adjective “dimly-lit” could suggest how the child prisoners are not even worth the paying of electrical bills. This highlights how uncaring the prison is towards child prisoners. Furthermore, in Source A, the writer feels that child prisoners have a hopeful future due to the prison system. We learn that child prisoners are allowed to develop “artistic skills” “that will help them find work after release”. The adjective “artistic” connotes freedom and imagination, implying how child prisoners are allowed to express themselves freely which is essential for their personality development and psychological well-being. This well-being and development of skills are essential for their future. Therefore, the writer “can’t hide” his “surprise”, implying how the writer feels that the prison system brings hope to child prisoners, preparing them for the future. In contrast, in Source B, the writer feels that the prison system makes child prisoners suffer psychologically and feels hopeless for their future. We learn that the children are “punished by” a system they “cannot understand”. This implies how they will never learn how to behave well and live a better life in society when they are released. As a result, the writer’s “heart could not help but break”. THe noun “heart” connotes love. The fact that the symbol of love “breaks” highlights how the writer feels sympathy for child prisoners. The writer may have done this to evoke sympathy from The Daisy Chronicle in order to advocate for a change in the treatment of child prisoners, in order to stop this suffering of child prisoners.