The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion, clearly outlining the main points that will be explored. To improve, consider providing a more specific thesis statement that directly answers the question about how sympathy is created, perhaps by briefly mentioning the key methods Stevenson uses.
The second paragraph presents strong textual evidence and analysis, particularly with the simile and symbolism. To enhance this paragraph, you could further elaborate on how the reader's perception of Jekyll shifts due to these descriptions, creating a more explicit link to the sympathy being generated.
In the third paragraph, the discussion of Jekyll's ambitions is insightful. However, it could benefit from a clearer connection to how these ambitions specifically evoke sympathy. Consider adding a sentence that directly ties Jekyll's noble intentions to the reader's emotional response.
The fourth paragraph effectively draws parallels between Jekyll and real-world issues like addiction. To improve, you could include a more explicit statement about how this comparison enhances the reader's sympathy for Jekyll, perhaps by discussing the universality of his struggle.
The conclusion provides a powerful wrap-up, but it could be strengthened by summarizing the key points made throughout the essay. A brief recap of how each point contributes to the overall sympathy for Jekyll would provide a more cohesive ending.
To reach a higher level in AO1, focus on maintaining a critical style throughout the essay. Ensure that each point made is clearly linked back to the question of sympathy for Jekyll. In AO2, while the analysis of language and structure is strong, incorporating more varied subject terminology would enhance the depth of the analysis. For AO3, while there is a good understanding of context, explicitly linking Jekyll's experiences to broader societal issues could strengthen the response.
The essay demonstrates a deep understanding of Dr. Jekyll's character and effectively uses textual evidence to support interpretations. The analysis of Stevenson’s methods, such as symbolism and narrative voice, is insightful and contributes to a nuanced exploration of the theme of sympathy.
To achieve a higher mark, the essay should ensure that all points are directly tied to the creation of sympathy for Jekyll. Additionally, increasing the variety of subject terminology in the analysis and making clearer connections between Jekyll's experiences and societal issues would enhance the overall quality of the response.
Overall, this essay presents a thoughtful and well-structured analysis of how Stevenson creates sympathy for Dr. Jekyll. The use of textual evidence is strong, and the exploration of themes is insightful. However, to reach a higher mark, the essay should focus on making more explicit connections between the analysis and the question, as well as enhancing the variety of language and terminology used.